Integration between radio (constrained by regulation and having evolved from a broad spectrum of frequency dedication), cell, ride command / no api), proprietary / non open architecture Some describe it as a mess others as a melting pot of I'll aligned Hodge-podge of electronic, computer, and communication technology. The offroad community including manufactures and other subsets of interest are being forced to implement interface solutions on the hardware, communication and application layers. At this point thank God for Bluetooth, industry standards like usb c. Relative to headphones, I use Sena because it has a relatively good Bluetooth implementation. Terrible hard wired usb like implementation. Polaris needs to set a firm architecture direction with ride command and allow others apps to interact with it. they are a mechanical equipment company, not radio, not software, not hardware, not digital communications not a GPS , etc.. It seems clear that the cell phone is a common hub today, serving in a hub spoke architecture with the rest of the mess. A peer to peer architecture may never be possible? Adopt some industry standards and focus back on the core business. Symptoms of the problem are glaringly apparent by taking a look at the dash on a typical off road rig == ride command + cell phone + radio + tablet .. Holy Shit ... what a free-for-all. Polaris needs to lead the way. My rant for the day ... and we consumers are paying for the mess and still searching for that one component/ holy Grail that's going to best meet our individual needs.